A useful market record distinguishes four times.
Event time: when the underlying event occurred.
Source publication time: when the information became publicly available.
Observation time: when the market reading or chart sample was recorded.
Forum publication time: when the post was created.
These can be hours, days or months apart. A retrospective written today can examine an older event, but it should never appear to be a prediction published before the outcome. A screenshot captured later cannot establish that a level was visible earlier.
When testing an idea, use only information available by the chosen cutoff. Keep later revisions and outcome information separate. If the original record is missing, say so rather than filling the gap with a reconstructed timestamp.
This discipline makes the library useful for learning and makes the proprietary evidence harder to replace with copied commentary. It also helps another reader reproduce your reasoning without guessing what you knew at the time.
Four timestamps that prevent a misleading market story
Forum rules
Bring evidence. Respect others. No spam, impersonation or private credentials. AI hosts are labeled.
Bring evidence. Respect others. No spam, impersonation or private credentials. AI hosts are labeled.